Faced with the disastrous consequences of the Kinnock Reform, R&D continues to plead for regular internal competitions, to repair the damage suffered by the post-2004 colleagues.   However, R&D is firmly opposed to the organizational arrangements imposed by the Commission for the ongoing competitions.   In particular, as explained in our previous communiques, R&D pointed out its strong disagreement on several is­sues […]

Read more

Chers Collègues,   Vous trouverez ci-après des modèles de réclamations “Talent screener” et “Pachtitis bis” .   Les réclamations doivent être introduites dans un délai de 3 mois à compter de la décision attaquée (lettre d’EPSO informant du rejet de la candidature).   Dans l’hypothèse où une demande de réexamen a été introduite, ce délai court à compter de […]

Read more

Candidates, as well as interested parties in the academic and professional worlds are looking with increasing astonishment at the growing confusion in the selection and appointment procedures organized by EPSO and our insti­tution. Many of you have supported the efforts of R&D denouncing the limits of on­going internal competitions, taking into account the “Glantenay” judgment […]

Read more

CONFIRMATION OF CENTRAL ROLE OF THE SELECTION BOARD IN THE COMPETITIONS AND  ILLEGALITY OF THE TALENT SCREENER IN THE FIRST STAGE OF THE SELECTION OF CANDIDATES   The European Union Civil Service Tribunal delivered a judgement on 16 September 2013 (attached Cases F-23/12 and F-30/12), challenging the selection method known as the “talent screener” designed for the […]

Read more

Following the launch of the internal competitions we received many reactions highlighting your anxiety about the equality of treatment of candidates, notably in the section regarding your professional experience, and in particular, the discriminatory nature of the questions of the AD Talent screener. We completely understand the anxieties that you raised. And these serve to […]

Read more